Pain On Both Sides Of Belly

a remarkable disappointment, 2 A featured part

I watched the movie with a friend, who was of itself a few years of Sannyasin movement and the Osho Ashram in Poona and still knew from personal experience. She responded emotionally similar to the movie as I do, but on different backgrounds. For them the movie was clearly a Hetzfilm "I was even more annoyed by the superficiality of the movie that raises more questions than answers. How to make a film like that, which is in effect for no apparent common thread stringing together anecdotes and the rest of the audience leaves his perplexity.

I do not agree with you that this film is a "Hetzfilm" he is not even that, because that would mean so, nor that he left a position represents. If he did not like my impression. His position is that he can get two witnesses to speak, seemingly at random, though, there are many dozens of the inner circle that would have something to say about Osho. Why so? Why these two?

Bhagwan Sheela Birnstiel in the 70

What I criticize in the film, that the social dimensions of development reflects hardly be shown, that the phenomenon of "Verkirchung" and the solidification of the anarchic and largely non-dogmatic spiritual teachings of Osho. How could this happen, where Osho's teaching was so free, anarchist and flexible? That would have been an interesting question in my eyes! The followers of Osho

represented presumption that tragedy in Oregon was such a thing as a "Meisterspielchen" is a charming idea apologetic. Has anyone learned anything from this game? Because only then does such a Game sense if it brings further teaches, transforms, namely mass, when it would prefer a quantum leap in knowledge to himself. From such a quantum leap but unfortunately I have heard nothing.

Osho's genius was in my view is that it was the first I know of Guru, the early, already in the 70s, the modern media (first audio, video cassettes and later) deliberately used as multipliers of his teachings has. This Bhagwan has very early and radically raised the traditional personal relationship between spiritual teachers and their pupils in a globalized stage, which is no longer based on this personal bond. That this results of course, some significant shadow is obvious (for example, has a guru who knows his students do not personally, and no feedback about the effect of his teachings in the person of the individual student).

These and such interesting questions the film barely touches, nor, and this is the biggest disappointment of this film, the radical and anarchic spiritual teaching Bhagwan not even begin to sketch in this film. This leaves open fully, why hundreds of thousands or more people in the world still get glowing eyes when his name is. Do not stop the eyes of a Sheela, each of which has now given way to shine.