high above San Francisco, Gary B. Friedman was high. In his Nobel-decorated office (Eternit IT leader Alfred Tauchnitz, "'ne dufte room") on the 32nd Floor of the Embarcadero Center, he nailed the color photograph of a check in the precious tapestry. The opening took place without the exhibitor.
base of Happy Beginnings was the IBM Germany. She had sent the co-founder ITLE Friedman (former IBM manager in Frisco District) 80,000 marks fine.
notice of the fine against IBM has not made out by the Supreme Court of the United States, but by the regional court in Stuttgart. The occasion was 32 000 bytes to the Swabian Klett-Verlag, 22 August 1972 at ITLE Germany-branch had rented. Monthly rent: 4,500 marks. Reason for the hire was not the cheapest price. The offer of Velcro ITLE replied in a position to free the system from the IBM leased / 360-30 from a storage terminal. From 64 K at IBM was no more. ITLE supplied and installed the memory size to 96 K. Then went on climbing any more.
a letter dated 12/14/1972 had the IBM office retail and services (signature iV Stulle) succinctly that the maintenance "of the unchanged part of the central entity within the technical field sales, IBM Germany resources available virtually impossible "is. This was associated with the call, . To remove the change and the original state of the machine to restore ... to continue the lease with us in order to "hook
passed the ball to ITLE, asking in a letter dated 29 December 1972 (Signature: Dr. Reichel ) "in direct contact with the IBM office Stuttgart ensure that maintenance of the rented from us IBM machine / ensures 360-30.
The sales manager of Germany-ITLE, Jürgen Selig made short work and went into court . In a thirty-page document, IBM was accused of "a dominant undertaking" a competitor "disabled unfair to have" interim value of the claim. 160 000 Mark. to prohibit this practice by the IBM injunction: the demand ITLE lawyers. This happened on 4 January 1973.
A day later, the 3rd in line Commercial Court of the District Court Stuttgart (Presiding Judge Dr. Becker) the TITLE-suggestion.
In the interim (Reference 3 04/73 KfH Kart) was ordered to continue the maintenance on Velcro, for each breach Geödstrafen threatened in unlimited amounts, but at least 500,000 marks.
was the first time in the Federal Republic of Germany secured the courts, that the IBM "dominant company within the meaning of § 26GWB is. At the same time their "discrimination within the meaning of § 26, Section 2 of the ARC "certified.
That was IBM too much. The comparison came as fast as the process.
The whole thing was more show than business. IBM, the issue played to their customers down to a lower management levels, ITLE Manager Selig conceded Although a lot of pats on the business's but gave more setbacks. The lion's share of the fine pocketed the lawyers.
base of Happy Beginnings was the IBM Germany. She had sent the co-founder ITLE Friedman (former IBM manager in Frisco District) 80,000 marks fine.
notice of the fine against IBM has not made out by the Supreme Court of the United States, but by the regional court in Stuttgart. The occasion was 32 000 bytes to the Swabian Klett-Verlag, 22 August 1972 at ITLE Germany-branch had rented. Monthly rent: 4,500 marks. Reason for the hire was not the cheapest price. The offer of Velcro ITLE replied in a position to free the system from the IBM leased / 360-30 from a storage terminal. From 64 K at IBM was no more. ITLE supplied and installed the memory size to 96 K. Then went on climbing any more.
a letter dated 12/14/1972 had the IBM office retail and services (signature iV Stulle) succinctly that the maintenance "of the unchanged part of the central entity within the technical field sales, IBM Germany resources available virtually impossible "is. This was associated with the call, . To remove the change and the original state of the machine to restore ... to continue the lease with us in order to "hook
passed the ball to ITLE, asking in a letter dated 29 December 1972 (Signature: Dr. Reichel ) "in direct contact with the IBM office Stuttgart ensure that maintenance of the rented from us IBM machine / ensures 360-30.
The sales manager of Germany-ITLE, Jürgen Selig made short work and went into court . In a thirty-page document, IBM was accused of "a dominant undertaking" a competitor "disabled unfair to have" interim value of the claim. 160 000 Mark. to prohibit this practice by the IBM injunction: the demand ITLE lawyers. This happened on 4 January 1973.
A day later, the 3rd in line Commercial Court of the District Court Stuttgart (Presiding Judge Dr. Becker) the TITLE-suggestion.
In the interim (Reference 3 04/73 KfH Kart) was ordered to continue the maintenance on Velcro, for each breach Geödstrafen threatened in unlimited amounts, but at least 500,000 marks.
was the first time in the Federal Republic of Germany secured the courts, that the IBM "dominant company within the meaning of § 26GWB is. At the same time their "discrimination within the meaning of § 26, Section 2 of the ARC "certified.
That was IBM too much. The comparison came as fast as the process.
The whole thing was more show than business. IBM, the issue played to their customers down to a lower management levels, ITLE Manager Selig conceded Although a lot of pats on the business's but gave more setbacks. The lion's share of the fine pocketed the lawyers.
continued
0 comments:
Post a Comment