Although it really has little to do with the central themes of this blog, I can not help but again a little bit of my mustard add the heated debate about our recently retired political luminary.
But based on the presence of the subject on the Internet are two opposite trends are visible:
- One trend that has rebelled and committed to carry out properly with work, namely the thesis in question to close examination. Which is expressed at this opportunity to thank, because these people have worked diligently and specifically to carry the propaganda on the floor of the facts. People have fought for it and understand it with scientific precision, to save the honor of science.
- The other tendency, committed and with a large inlet on the Internet, are those who see in Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg is still the hope and even after his resignation loudly complain about the injustice of the world that this shining light of policy some time now has to disappear into oblivion.
The whole thing is like already two camps, mental factions, which are themselves irreconcilable. The Baron seems to have become a question of faith. Which faith is it about?
To faith in the light of figures of light, of purity, of noble ethics ... in this spiritually dark time it expresses perhaps the hidden spiritual longing of many people - with some it's about the light, the noble ethics to preserve or restore science to protect their credibility. In the others the same applies to the field of politics, they too want to believe that light can be noble ethics, and luminaries in the shark tank.
The truth is: there is neither light nor noble baron, neither in science nor in politics. But the spiritual impoverishment of our culture is the metaphysical Man's desire to appear very strange playing fields.
